Timeline Assignment Essay

Due Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Submission Instructions: Bring printed essay to class and submit digitally

Assignment Description:

A timeline is a well-regarded method for showing a series of events in chronological order. But what is an event, exactly, and what does it mean to delve into the rich history of that event? This is an assignment about the crucial process of deepening one’s understanding of the historical development of the book as we know it today. You will can choose a central event or development related to this subject and write an 850-1,000-word essay on that event (about five paragraphs). In the essay, you will cover the event’s most important details, its importance to the history of the book, and its complexities and nuances. Some potentially interesting topics that we’ve already discussed include Bi Sheng’s invention of movable type, the development of quoc ngu, the rise of the codex, and the destruction of the Great Library at Alexandria. Alternatively, you might decide to investigate the earliest known use of italics, the origin of the fountain pen, the invention of rotogravure, or the first ebook format. For part 2 of this assignment, will add our events to a digital timeline but, for now, the focus is on the depth and sophistication of our historical investigations.

Assignment Requirements

Your work must be:
  1. typed in 12 point Times New Roman font
  2. double-spaced with no extra line between paragraphs
  3. stapled
  4. handed in on time
Your essay must have:
  • numbered pages
  • an original title
  • an unmistakable central event
  • a central argument articulated with a clear thesis statement
  • an introduction, at least three body paragraphs, and a conclusion
  • rich and well situated citations from:
    1. (1) three very reputable secondary sources on your topic and
    2. (2) a relevant primary source. 1
  • proper footnotes and works cited for your citations. Use Chicago style citations (consult a handbook or see me if you have questions about how to do this).
  • Questions to ask about your sources

    Grading Rubric

    I will use a descriptive, non-numerical rubric for this assignment. It includes the following criteria:

    Item Description
    Assignment Process: Evaluates whether students have followed directions properly. All materials are turned in on time and in the right place. Assignment directions are followed. Required components are all present and submitted on time.
    Attention to Detail in Writing: Language shows thought, precision, and control in word choice. Uses forms of grammar, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and syntax that are appropriate for published work. Demonstrates careful attention to proofreading. Uses key words consistently throughout the paper without changing or confusing meanings. Paper is written concisely. Correctly consistently cites external sources using Chicago style format.
    Argument and Thesis Statement: Demonstrates clear purpose, sophistication and originality; makes clear, sufficiently specific, and well-qualified claim about the significance of your central event.
    Argument Structure: Sequence of material supports thesis and purpose; progression of thought from sentence to sentence and paragraph to paragraph is smooth and controlled; use of meaningful transitions and the logical movement from idea to idea strengthen this progression. Includes a well-constructed introduction, body, and conclusion.
    Effectiveness of Support and Discussion: Evidence and examples are specific and relevant, and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the essay’s central claim; inserts source material in effective ways; demonstrates an ability to integrate sources using signal phrases and analysis; does NOT let quotations "speak for themselves."

    Footnotes

    1. Using Wikipedia is allowed, but you shouldn’t cite it, and it doesn’t count as one of your sources.
    2. See Rampola, Mary Lynn. A Pocket Guide to Writing in History. 2nd edition. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1998.